Davis v. Cooke et al
| Terrence Davis and Terrance Davis |
| Tasheena Cooke, Dugon, Nickles, Andrew and Garcia |
| 3:2022cv00473 |
| October 25, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Carla Baldwin |
| Anne R Traum |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 COMPLAINT by Terrance Davis. (Filed and dismissed with leave to amend pursuant to ECF No. #13 Order.) (DRM) |
Filing 13
SCREENING ORDER - The second and third IFP applications (ECF Nos. #6 , #8 ) are denied as moot A decision on the IFP application (ECF No. #1 ) is deferred. Clerk of Court is directed to file the Complaint (ECF No. #1 -1). The Complaint is dismissed in its entirety without prejudice and with leave to amend. The construed motions for a preliminary injunction or a temporary restraining order (ECF Nos. #3 , #9 , #10 ) are denied. The motion for appointment of counsel (ECF No. #7 ) is granted. This case is referred to the Pro Bono Program for appointment of counsel for the purposes identified herein. The Clerk of the Court shall forward a copy of this order to the Pro Bono Liaison. (Ad hoc email (NEF) to pro bono liaison on 11/18/2022.) Any "First Amended" complaint due within 90 days from the date of entry of this order (2/16/2023). Clerk is directed Send P approved 1983 form, instructions, and a copy of his complaint (Forms, instr, and copy complaint attached hereto for distribution to P via ESP law library.) If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint curing the deficiencies outlined in this order, this action will be dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim. Signed by District Judge Anne R. Traum on 11/18/2022. (Attachments: #1 1983 form and instructions, #2 Copy of Complaint for Plaintiff)(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
| Filing 12 PROPOSED SUBPOENAS to be issued by Plaintiff Terrance Davis. (CJS) |
| Filing 11 PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued by Plaintiff Terrance Davis. (CJS) |
| Filing 10 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by Plaintiff Terrance Davis. Responses due by 11/29/2022. (Image is duplicate of ECF No. #9 .)(CJS) |
| Filing 9 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Plaintiff Terrance Davis. Responses due by 11/29/2022. (CJS) |
| Filing 8 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Terrance Davis. (CJS) |
| Filing 7 Ex Parte MOTION for Appointment of Counsel by Plaintiff Terrance Davis. (CJS) |
| Filing 6 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Terrance Davis. (CJS) |
| Filing 5 PROPOSED SUBPOENA to be issued by Plaintiff Terrance Davis. (CJS) |
| Filing 4 PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued by Plaintiff Terrance Davis. (CJS) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Order to Show Cause by Plaintiff Terrance Davis. Responses due by 11/18/2022. (Attachments: #1 Declaration/Affidavit for Class Action Suit by Terrance Davis, #2 Declaration/Affidavit by Jordan A. Maurice)(CJS) (injunctive) |
| Filing 2 ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. (CJS) |
| Filing 1 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Terrence Davis. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Exhibit)(CJS) |
| Case randomly assigned to District Judge Anne R. Traum and Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin. (CJS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
