Martin v. Daniels et al
| Kenneth Martin |
| Charles Daniels, Brian Williams, Roach and Singleton |
| 3:2022cv00491 |
| November 3, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Carla Baldwin |
| Anne R Traum |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel, by Plaintiff Kenneth Martin. (DRM) |
| Filing 4 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Kenneth Martin. (DRM) |
Filing 3
ORDER $402 Filing fee or fully complete IFP application due by 1/6/2023. Clerk shall send P approved IFP form and instruction. (Attached hereto for distribution to P via NNCC law library.) Clerk shall retain the complaint but not file it at this time. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin on 11/7/2022. (Attachments: #1 IFP form and Instructions)(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
| Filing 2 ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. (DRM) |
| Filing 1 RECEIPT of Initiating Documents by Court on behalf of Plaintiff. No Application to Proceed IFP or Filing Fee received. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Declarations in Support, #3 Submission Sheet) (DRM) |
| Case randomly assigned to District Judge Anne R. Traum and Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin. (DRM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
