Vaden v. Social Security
| Judy Elizabeth Vaden |
| Commissioner Of Social Security |
| 3:2022cv00504 |
| November 9, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Craig S Denney |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 402 Social Security Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Michael Kramer Marriott on behalf of Defendant Commissioner Of Social Security. (Marriott, Michael) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Judy Elizabeth Vaden re #3 Summons Issued, #1 Complaint,,. Commissioner Of Social Security served on 11/25/2022. (Osterhout, Karl) |
Filing 6
ORDER appoving ECF No. #5 Verified Petition for Permission to Practice Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Karl E. Osterhout for Judy Elizabeth Vaden and approving Designation of Local Counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Craig S. Denney on 11/28/2022. Any Attorney not yet registered with the Court's e-filng system shall register on the PACER website #www.pacer.gov (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HKL)
|
| Filing 5 First MOTION/VERIFIED PETITION for Permission to Practice Pro Hac Vice by Karl E. Osterhout and DESIGNATION of Local Counsel Hal Taylor (Filing fee $ 250 receipt number ANVDC-7127317) by Plaintiff Judy Elizabeth Vaden. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Cert.GoodStand.W.D.PA, #2 Exhibit Cert.GoodStand.PA)(Taylor, Hal) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE to Clerk of Court Regarding Assignment of Social Security Cases. (Document restricted under General Order 2019-08.) (EDS) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Commissioner Of Social Security. (Attachments: #1 Summons as to Office of Regional Chief Counsel, #2 Summons as to USAO) (HKL) |
| Case randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Craig S. Denney. (HKL) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Judy Elizabeth Vaden. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Taylor, Hal) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner Of Social Security (Filing fee $402 receipt number ANVDC-7111836) by Judy Elizabeth Vaden. Proof of service due by 2/7/2023. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet CCS, #2 Summons USAG, #3 Summons OGC, #4 Summons USAO) (Taylor, Hal) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Vaden v. Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Judy Elizabeth Vaden | |
| Represented By: | Hal Taylor |
| Represented By: | Karl E. Osterhout |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner Of Social Security | |
| Represented By: | Michael Kramer Marriott |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
