Dorsey v. Reubart et al
| Denzel R. Dorsey |
| William Reubart and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada |
| 3:2022cv00508 |
| November 14, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Craig S Denney |
| Anne R Traum |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER - Within 30 days of the date of this order (2/11/2023) petitioner must submit either the $5.00 filing fee or a fully completed IFP application. Clerk shall send P 2 copies IFP application. (2 copies attached hereto for distribution to P via ESP law library.) Clerk shall retain the petition but not file it at this time. Signed by District Judge Anne R. Traum on 1/12/2023. (Attachments: #1 IFP form and Instructions, #2 2nd Copy IFP form and Instr)(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE from USDC advising case against William Reubart, et al., has been received and assigned case number 3:22-cv-00508-ART-CSD. (CJS) |
| Filing 1 RECEIPT of Initiating Documents by Court on behalf of Petitioner. No Application to Proceed IFP or Filing Fee received. (Attachments: #1 Petition) (CJS) |
| Case randomly assigned to District Judge Anne R. Traum and Magistrate Judge Craig S. Denney. (CJS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
