Morales v. Balaam et al
| Adrien Morales |
| Darin Balaam, Naphcare Medical Director, Naphcare Medical Staff and Washoe Sheriff Deputies |
| 3:2022cv00510 |
| November 15, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Craig S Denney |
| Miranda M Du |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER - ECF No. #1 IFP Application is denied without prejudice. $402 filing fee or fully complete IFP Application due by 2/13/2022. Clerk shall send P approved IFP Form w instructions. (Attached hereto for distribution to P via NNCC law library.) Clerk shall retain the complaint (ECF No. #1 -1) but not file it at this time. Signed by Magistrate Judge Craig S. Denney on 12/14/2022. (Attachments: #1 IFP form and Instructions)(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
| Filing 3 CLERK'S NOTICE. Electronic filing of prisoner filings in civil rights cases at Northern Nevada Correctional Center is now mandatory under General Order 2012-01. (CJS) |
| Filing 2 ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. (CJS) |
| Filing 1 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Adrien Morales. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Motion for Appointment of Counsel)(CJS) |
| Case randomly assigned to Chief Judge Miranda M. Du and Magistrate Judge Craig S. Denney. (CJS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
