Haylor Properties et al v. Packwood et al
Haylor Properties, Tayden Properties, Andrea Wood and Taylor Packwood |
Niagra Falls County |
3:2022cv00515 |
November 21, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Carla Baldwin |
Anne R Traum |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - IT IS THEREFORE RECOMMENDED that Plaintiffs' application to proceed in forma pauperis, (ECF No. #1 ), be DENIED as moot; IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that the Clerk FILE the complaint, (ECF No. #1 -1); IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that the complaint, (ECF No. #1 -1), be DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, to the extent Plaintiffs can assert plausible claims for relief in the correct court; and, IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that this action be CLOSED and that judgment be entered accordingly. Objections to R&R due by 12/13/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin on 11/29/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - CJS) |
Filing 2 ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. (CJS) |
Filing 1 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Andrea Wood. (Attachments: #1 Initiating Document/Breach of Contract Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(CJS) |
Case randomly assigned to District Judge Anne R. Traum and Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin. (CJS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.