McKendry-Verhunce v. Wozniak et al
Plaintiff: Ryan Ross McKendry-Verhunce
Defendant: Steve Wozniak and Nick Griebel
Case Number: 3:2022cv00524
Filed: November 28, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Presiding Judge: Carla Baldwin
Referring Judge: Anne R Traum
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 24, 2023 Filing 5 OBJECTION to ECF No. #4 Report and Recommendation by Plaintiff Ryan Ross McKendry-Verhunce. Response to Objections to R&R due by 2/7/2023. (CJS)
January 17, 2023 Filing 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - IT IS RECOMMENDED that this action be DISMISSED without prejudice; and, IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that the Clerk of Court ENTER JUDGMENT accordingly. Objections to R&R due by 1/31/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin on 1/17/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - CJS)
November 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER TO PAY FILING FEE OR FILE APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS - IT IS ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court will SEND McKendry-Verhunce the approved form application to proceed in forma pauperis by an inmate, as well as the document entitled information and instructions for filing an in forma pauperis application. (Form with instructions attached hereto for distribution to P via NNCC Law Library.) IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that on or before Thursday, January 12, 2023, McKendry-Verhunce will either pay the full $402 filing fee for a civil action (which includes the $350 filing fee and the $52 administrative fee) or file with the Court: (1) a completed Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis for Inmate as detailed herein or be subject to dismissal without prejudice (1/12/2023). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court will retain the complaint (ECF No. #1 -1) but will not file it at this time. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin on 11/28/2022. (Attachments: #1 IFP Form with Instructions)(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - CJS)
November 28, 2022 Filing 2 ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. (CJS)
November 28, 2022 Filing 1 RECEIPT of Initiating Documents by Court on behalf of Plaintiff. No Application to Proceed IFP or Filing Fee received. (Attachments: #1 Complaint) (CJS)
November 28, 2022 Case randomly assigned to District Judge Anne R. Traum and Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin. (CJS)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McKendry-Verhunce v. Wozniak et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ryan Ross McKendry-Verhunce
Represented By: Northern Nevada Correctional Center
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Steve Wozniak
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nick Griebel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?