Guerrero v. Torez et al
| Gelasio J. Guerrero |
| Amber Torez, Roman Sanchez, Brian Almarez, Gina Wachsmuth, Andrea Martinez, Spencer Quintero, Standard Frank, Jr., Gina Williams, Frank Honeywell, Darin Balaam, Josh Gonzalaz and Miranda Quintero |
| 3:2023cv00005 |
| January 5, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Craig S Denney |
| Miranda M Du |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Gelasio J. Guerrero. (DRM) |
Filing 3
ORDER - Plaintiff's IFP application (ECF No. #1 ) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Clerk shall SEND Plaintiff a copy of the instructions and application to proceed IFP for an inmate. (Mailed to P at WCDF on 2/2/2023.) Plaintiff has 30 days from the date of this Order (3/3/2023) to either file his completed IFP application on the court's form and financial certificate or pay the full $402 filing fee. Signed by Magistrate Judge Craig S. Denney on 2/1/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
| Filing 2 ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. (CJS) |
| Filing 1 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Gelasio J. Guerrero. (Attachments: #1 Complaint)(CJS) |
| Case randomly assigned to Chief Judge Miranda M. Du and Magistrate Judge Craig S. Denney. (DRM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
