Whitfield v. Keast et al
| Michael Whitfield |
| J. Keast, Jessica Rambur, Fernandeis Frazier, Warden William Gittere and L. Boris |
| 3:2023cv00123 |
| March 21, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Craig S Denney |
| Miranda M Du |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Michael Whitfield. (CJS) |
Filing 3
ORDER - $402 filing fee, or fully complete IFP application due by 5/26/2023. Clerk will send Plaintiff Whitfield the approved IFP application forms and instructions (attached hereto for distribution to P via NNCC law library), and will retain the complaint (ECF No. #1 -1) but not file it at this time. Signed by Magistrate Judge Craig S. Denney on 3/27/2023. (Attachments: #1 IFP form and Instructions)(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
| Filing 2 ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. (CJS) |
| Case randomly assigned to Chief Judge Miranda M. Du and Magistrate Judge Craig S. Denney. (CJS) |
| Filing 1 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Michael Whitfield. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Motion for Appointment of Counsel)(CJS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
