Rathel v. Social Security
Plaintiff: Ladonna Marie Rathel
Defendant: Commissioner Of Social Security
Interested Party: SSA-Office of the General Counsel
Case Number: 3:2023cv00144
Filed: April 4, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Presiding Judge: Craig S Denney
Referring Judge: Larry R Hicks
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 23, 2023 Filing 6 First STATUS REPORT by Plaintiff Ladonna Marie Rathel.. (Taylor, Hal)
May 8, 2023 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Franco Becia on behalf of Defendant Commissioner Of Social Security. (Becia, Franco)
May 1, 2023 Filing 4 CLERK'S NOTICE that this case is randomly reassigned to Judge Larry R. Hicks and Magistrate Judge Craig S. Denney for all further proceedings. All further documents must bear the correct case number 3:23-cv-00144-LRH-CSD. (no image attached) (EDS)
April 18, 2023 Filing 3 NOTICE pursuant to General Order 2019-08: This case has been randomly assigned to a Magistrate Judge pending the parties' consent or declination. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), with written consent of all parties, a Magistrate Judge may conduct all proceedings in a case, including all pretrial and trial proceedings, entry of judgment, and post-trial motions. Any appeals will be made directly to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. A link is being provided to the form on the court's website to indicate whether you consent or decline to proceed before a Magistrate Judge - #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. (A copy of the notice and consent form have been mailed to parties not receiving electronic service.) Consent or declination due by 4/28/2023. (DRM)
April 18, 2023 Case randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Craig S. Denney. (DRM)
April 4, 2023 Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Ladonna Marie Rathel. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case. (Taylor, Hal)
April 4, 2023 Filing 1 First MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Ladonna Marie Rathel. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Complaint, #2 Exhibit Ex A to Complaint, #3 Civil Cover Sheet CCS)(Taylor, Hal)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rathel v. Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ladonna Marie Rathel
Represented By: Hal Taylor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner Of Social Security
Represented By: Franco Becia
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: SSA-Office of the General Counsel
Represented By: Blaine T Welsh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?