Altamirano v. Garrett et al
| Henry Altamirano |
| Warden Tim Garrett and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada |
| 3:2023cv00266 |
| June 12, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Craig S Denney |
| Miranda M Du |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Docket Correction to ECF No. 9 Docket entry, : Denoted as Docket Error, Wrong Case, image ECF No. 9 removed. (no image attached) (GA) |
| Filing 9 DOCKETING ERROR - WRONG CASE - DISREGARD THIS ENTRY : RECEIPT of Initiating Documents by Court on behalf of Petitioner. No Application to Proceed IFP or Filing Fee received. (Attachments: # 1 Motion to Vacate Judgement, # 2 Exhibits) (GA) Modified on 8/7/2023 to denote docketing error; disregard (GA). |
| Filing 8 RESPONSE to #7 Order to Show Cause by Petitioner Henry Altamirano. (CJS) |
Filing 7
ORDER - Petitioner must show cause in writing within 45 days of the date of this order (9/14/2023) as to why this action should not be dismissed as untimely. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 7/31/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DLS)
|
| Filing 6 RECEIPT of Payment: $ 5.00 Habeas Corpus fee paid, receipt number 2-4839. (DLS) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER - The initial screening of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. #1 -1) is deferred until Petitioner has fully complied with this order. Within 45 days of the date of this order (8/27/2023), Petitioner must pay the $5.00 filing fee. The Clerk of Court is directed to send Petitioner two copies of this order. (Attached hereto for distribution to P via LCC Law Library). If Petitioner decides to pay the filing fee from his inmate account, he must arrange to have a copy of this order attached to the check for the filing fee. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 7/13/2023. (Attachments: #1 2nd Copy of Order)(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DLS)
|
| Filing 3 FINANCIAL CERTIFICATE by Petitioner Henry Altamirano (case no. provided in efile email). (HKL) Modified on 7/7/2023 to reflect case no. provided by institution (HKL). |
|
Filing 4
ORDER - It is ordered that the initial screening of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. #1 -1) under the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases is deferred until Petitioner has fully complied with this order. The Clerk of Court is directed to send Petitioner a blank form IFP application for incarcerated litigants along with instructions, and a copy of this order. (Attached hereto for distribution to P via LCC Law Library).Within 45 days of the date of this order (8/20/2023), Petitioner must file an IFP application or pay the filing fee. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 7/6/2023. (Attachments: #1 Inmate IFP and Instructions)(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DLS)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE from USDC advising case against Tim Garrett, et al., has been received and assigned case number 3:23-cv-00266. (DLS) |
| Filing 1 RECEIPT of Initiating Documents by Court on behalf of Petitioner. No Application to Proceed IFP or Filing Fee received. (Attachments: #1 Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus) (DLS) |
| Case randomly assigned to Chief Judge Miranda M. Du and Magistrate Judge Craig S. Denney. (DLS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
