Hagin v. Hakin
Robert Patrick Hagin |
Thomas Hakin and Reno Police Department |
3:2023cv00284 |
June 12, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Craig S Denney |
Miranda M Du |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 COMPLAINT against Thomas Hakin, by Robert Patrick Hagin. (Filed pursuant to ECF No. #3 order). (DLS) |
Filing 3 ORDER - Plaintiff's IFP Application (ECF No. #1 ) is GRANTED; however, within 30 DAYS Plaintiff must pay an initial partial filing fee in the amount of $8 (9/6/2023). The Clerk must SEND a copy of this Order to the Chief of Inmate Services for the Washoe County Detention Facility. (Mailed 8/8/2023). The Clerk will FILE the complaint (ECF No. #1 -1). Plaintiff may PROCEED with the Fourth Amendment excessive force claim against Thomas Hakin; however, the Reno Police Department is DISMISSED WITH LEAVE TO AMEND.The Clerk shall SEND Plaintiff the instructions for filing a civil rights complaint by an incarcerated individual and form civil rights complaint by an inmate. (Mailed 8/8/2023).Plaintiff has 30 DAYS from the date of this order (9/6/2023) to file an amended complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Craig S. Denney on 8/7/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DLS) |
Filing 2 ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. (AF) |
Case randomly assigned to Chief Judge Miranda M. Du and Magistrate Judge Craig S. Denney. (GA) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.