Scott v. State of Nevada ex rel NDOC et al
| James Edward Scott, III |
| State of Nevada ex rel NDOC, Joe Lombardo, Steve Sisolak, Charles A Daniels and Brian Sandoval |
| 3:2023cv00301 |
| June 22, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Craig S Denney |
| Miranda M Du |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, by Plaintiff James Edward Scott, III. (GA) |
Filing 3
ORDER - IFP Application (ECF No. #1 ) is denied without prejudice. Plaintiff has until August 25, 2023 to either pay the full filing fee or file a new fully complete IFP application. The Clerk is directed to send Plaintiff the approved IFP Application and instructions for the same, and retain the complaint (ECF No. #1 -1) but not file it at this time. (Attached hereto for distribution to P via NNCC Law Library). Signed by Magistrate Judge Craig S. Denney on 6/26/2023. (Attachments: #1 Inmate IFP and Instructions)(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DLS)
|
| Filing 2 ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. (CJS) |
| Filing 1 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff James Edward Scott, III. (Attachments: #1 Complaint)(CJS) |
| Case randomly assigned to Chief Judge Miranda M. Du and Magistrate Judge Craig S. Denney. (CJS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
