Daly v. Kijakazi
| Deanne Lynn Daly |
| Kililo Kijakazi |
| SSA-Office of the General Counsel |
| 3:2023cv00310 |
| June 26, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Craig S Denney |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Deanne Lynn Daly. Kililo Kijakazi served on 7/20/2023; SSA-Office of the General Counsel served on 7/20/2023. (Busani, Raquel) |
| Filing 10 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Deanne Lynn Daly. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Hatfield, Trevor) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE to Clerk of Court Regarding Assignment of Case to Magistrate Judge. (Document restricted under General Order 2021-03.) |
| Filing 7 MOTION/VERIFIED PETITION for Permission to Practice Pro Hac Vice by Raquel M. Busani and DESIGNATION of Local Counsel Trevor J. Hatfield (Filing fee $ 250 receipt number ANVDC-7351970) by Petitioner Deanne Lynn Daly. (Hatfield, Trevor) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Oscar Gonzalez on behalf of Respondent Kililo Kijakazi. (Gonzalez, Oscar) |
Filing 5
ORDER CONCERNING REVIEW OF SOCIAL SECURITY CASES : Defendant shall submit the administrative record, under seal, to CM/ECF within seven (7) days of the filing of the Answer. (See pdf order for additional contingent deadlines and specifics.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Craig S. Denney on 6/29/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO COUNSEL PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE IA 11-2. Counsel Raquel M Busani to comply with completion and filing of the Verified Petition and Designation of Local Counsel. For your convenience, click on the following link to obtain the form from the Court's website - #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. Upon approval of the Verified Petition, counsel is required to register for the Court's Case Management and Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) system and the electronic service of documents. Please visit the PACER website www.pacer.gov to register Attorney. Verified Petition due by 7/11/2023. (no image attached) (KF) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Kililo Kijakazi. (DRM) |
| Filing 2 CLERK'S NOTICE of Assignment of Social Security case to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to General Order 2019-08. Attached is a form to indicate whether you consent or decline to proceed before a Magistrate Judge. See notice for details. (#www.nvd.uscourts.gov). A copy of the notice and consent form have been mailed to parties not receiving electronic service. Consent or declination due by 7/7/2023. Please file the completed form under the filing event called Notice to Clerk - Consent or Declination in the Social Security civil menu category. (DRM) |
| Case randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Craig S. Denney. (DRM) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Kililo Kijakazi (Filing fee $402 receipt number ANVDC-7342426) by Deanne Lynn Daly. Certificate of Interested Parties due by 7/6/2023. Proof of service due by 9/24/2023. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Hatfield, Trevor) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
