Ruiz v. Elko County Court House et al
| Victor Ruiz |
| Elko County Court House and State of Nevada |
| 3:2023cv00353 |
| July 14, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Carla Baldwin |
| Anne R Traum |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. IT IS RECOMMENDED that this action be DISMISSED without prejudice; and, IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that the Clerk of Court ENTER JUDGMENT accordingly. Objections to R&R due by 9/20/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin on 9/6/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DLS) |
Filing 3
ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court will SEND Ruiz the approved IFP application form and instructions. (Mailed to P on 7/31/2023.) Fully complete IFP application, or $402 filing fee, due by 8/30/2023.Clerk will retain the petition for name change (ECF No. #1 -1) but will not file it at this time. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin on 7/31/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
| Filing 2 ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. (GA) |
| Filing 1 RECEIPT of Initiating Documents by Court on behalf of Plaintiff. No Application to Proceed IFP or Filing Fee received. (Attachments: #1 Complaint) (GA) |
| Case randomly assigned to District Judge Anne R. Traum and Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin. (GA) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
