Volosin v. Garrett
Jeffrey David Volosin |
Tim Garrett |
3:2023cv00362 |
July 18, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Reno Office |
Craig S Denney |
Miranda M Du |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 REPLY to ECF No. #6 Order to Show Cause, by Petitioner Jeffrey David Volosin. (DRM) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Service of Petition, by Jeffrey David Volosin.. (DRM) |
Filing 8 MOTION for Stay and Abeyance, by Petitioner Jeffrey David Volosin. (DRM) |
Filing 7 ERRATA to ECF No. #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, by Petitioner Jeffrey David Volosin. (DRM) |
Filing 6 ORDER - It is ordered that Petitioner Jeffrey David Volosin show cause within 45 days of the date of this order (9/8/2023) why this action should not be dismissed as untimely and/or unexhausted. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 7/25/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DLS) |
Filing 5 RECEIPT of Payment: Filing Fee $ 5.00 PAID per ECF No. #4 Order. Receipt number 3-0279, (DRM) |
Filing 4 ORDER - The initial screening of the Petition is deferred until such time as Volosin has fully complied with this order. On or before September 8, 2023, Volosin must file an IFP Application or pay the filing fee. If Volosin decides to pay the filing fee from his inmate account, he must arrange to have a copy of this order attached to the check for the filing fee. The Clerk of Court will send Volosin one blank copy of the IFP application form for inmates along with instructions and two copies of this order. (Attached hereto for distribution to P via LCC Law Library). Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 7/19/2023. (Attachments: #1 2nd Copy of Order, #2 Inmate IFP form and Instructions)(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DLS) |
Filing 3 NOTICE from USDC advising case against Tim Garrett, et al., has been received and assigned case number 3:23-cv-00362-MMD-CSD. (Re-entered due to CMECF issues). (GA) |
Filing 2 NOTICE from USDC advising case against Tim Garrett, et al., has been received and assigned case number 3:23-cv-00362-MMD-CSD. (GA). Modified on 7/19/2023 to manually add Advisory Letter due to CMECF issues. (GA). |
Case randomly assigned to Chief Judge Miranda M. Du and Magistrate Judge Craig S. Denney. (GA) |
Filing 1 RECEIPT of Initiating Documents by Court on behalf of Petitioner. No Application to Proceed IFP or Filing Fee received. (Attachments: #1 Petition) (GA) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Volosin v. Garrett | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Jeffrey David Volosin | |
Represented By: | Lovelock Correctional Center |
Represented By: | Law Library - Lovelock CC |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Tim Garrett | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.