Penkal v. Social Security
| Gavin Scott Penkal |
| Commissioner Of Social Security |
| SSA-Office of the General Counsel |
| 3:2023cv00393 |
| August 13, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Reno Office |
| Carla Baldwin |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 30, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD (CAR) filed by Defendant Commissioner Of Social Security. (Electronic access to the CAR is restricted to case participants only.) (Attachments: #1 001 Certification Page, #2 002 Court Transcript Index, #3 003 Documents Related to Administrative Process Including Transcript of Oral Hearing, if applicable, #4 004 Payment Documents and Decisions, #5 005 Jurisdictional Documents and Notices, #6 006 Non Disability Related Development, #7 007 Disability Related Development, #8 008 Medical Records) (Welsh, Blaine) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Blaine T Welsh on behalf of Defendant Commissioner Of Social Security. (Welsh, Blaine) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney L. Jamala Edwards on behalf of Defendant Commissioner Of Social Security. (Edwards, L.) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE to Clerk of Court Regarding Assignment of Social Security Cases. (Document restricted under General Order 2019-08.) (Taylor, Hal) |
| Filing 6 COMPLAINT against Commissioner Of Social Security, by Gavin Scott Penkal. Certificate of Interested Parties due by 8/24/2023. Proof of service due by 11/12/2023. (DLS) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Gavin Scott Penkal. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Taylor, Hal) |
Filing 4
ORDER CONCERNING REVIEW OF SOCIAL SECURITY CASES. Defendant shall submit the administrative record, under seal, to CM/ECF within seven (7) days of the filing of the Answer. See order for additional deadlines. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin on 8/14/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DLS)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER - Plaintiff's IFP (ECF No. #1 ) is GRANTED. The Complaint shall PROCEED and the Clerk shall FILE the Complaint (ECF No. #1 -1). The Clerk shall provide notice of this action to the Commissioner pursuant to Rule 3 of the Supplemental Rules for Social Security. Plaintiff must serve a copy of every pleading or other document submitted for consideration by the Court upon the defendant, or defendant's counsel, together with a certificate of service. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin on 8/14/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DLS)
|
| Filing 2 CLERK'S NOTICE of Assignment of Social Security case to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to General Order 2019-08. Attached is a form to indicate whether you consent or decline to proceed before a Magistrate Judge. See notice for details. (#www.nvd.uscourts.gov). A copy of the notice and consent form have been mailed to parties not receiving electronic service. Consent or declination due by 8/24/2023. Please file the completed form under the filing event called Notice to Clerk - Consent or Declination in the Social Security civil menu category. (DRM) |
| Case randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin. (DRM) |
| Filing 1 First MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Gavin Scott Penkal. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Complaint, #2 Exhibit Ex A to Complaint, #3 Civil Cover Sheet CCS)(Taylor, Hal) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
