Williams v. United States of America et al
Thomas L. Williams and Malik Bey Surrell, III |
United States of America, Houston, Texas, Atlanta, Georgia, Memphis, Tennessee, Oakland, California, Memphis Police, Houston Police, Atlanta Police and OPD Oakland Police |
3:2023cv00400 |
August 15, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Craig S Denney |
Anne R Traum |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 OBJECTION to ECF No. #3 Report and Recommendation by Plaintiff Thomas L. Williams. Response to Objections to R&R due by 10/11/2023. (DLS) |
Filing 4 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Thomas L. Williams. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter)(DLS) |
Filing 3 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that the District Judge enter an order DISMISSING the complaint (ECF No. #1 -1) WITHOUT PREJUDICE for improper venue; and DENYING the IFP application (ECF No. #1 ) AS MOOT. Objections to R&R due by 9/28/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Craig S. Denney on 9/14/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DLS) |
Filing 2 ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. (DRM) |
Filing 1 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Thomas L. Williams. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(DRM) |
Case randomly assigned to District Judge Anne R. Traum and Magistrate Judge Craig S. Denney. (DLS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.