Boyd v. Social Security
| Donna M. Boyd |
| Commissioner Of Social Security |
| SSA-Office of the General Counsel |
| 3:2023cv00482 |
| October 1, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Craig S Denney |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Franco Becia on behalf of Defendant Commissioner Of Social Security. (Becia, Franco) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Donna M. Boyd. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case. (Taylor, Hal) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE to Clerk of Court Regarding Assignment of Social Security Cases. (Document restricted under General Order 2019-08.) (DRM) |
| Case randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Craig S. Denney. (DRM) |
| Filing 1 First COMPLAINT against Commissioner Of Social Security (Filing fee $402 receipt number ANVDC-7444946) by Donna M. Boyd. Certificate of Interested Parties due by 10/11/2023. Proof of service due by 12/30/2023. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet CCS) (Taylor, Hal) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. Modified on 10/2/2023 (DRM). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
