Rausch v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
| Daniel Rausch |
| State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company |
| 3:2023cv00483 |
| October 2, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Carla Baldwin |
| Larry R Hicks |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 NOTICE PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE IB 2-2: In accordance with 28 USC 636(c) and FRCP 73, the parties in this action are provided with a link to the "AO 85 Notice of Availability, Consent, and Order of Reference - Exercise of Jurisdiction by a U.S. Magistrate Judge" form on the Court's website - #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. AO 85 Consent forms should NOT be electronically filed. Upon consent of all parties, counsel are advised to manually file the form with the Clerk's Office. (A copy of form AO 85 has been mailed to parties not receiving electronic service.) (DLS) |
Filing 13
SCHEDULING ORDER granting ECF No. #11 Stipulated Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order. Discovery due by 4/4/2024. Dispositive Motions due by 5/6/2024. See order for additional deadlines. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin on 10/18/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DLS)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER - The Court has reviewed the joint case management report, (ECF No. #10 ), and it does not appear that an initial case management conference is necessary. If the parties disagree, they may file a stipulation requesting a case management conference. In the event a discovery dispute arises, the parties shall follow the informal discovery dispute procedure outlined in the Court's standing order. (ECF No. #7 .) IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin on 10/18/2023. (no image attached) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AMC)
|
| Filing 11 Stipulated Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order by Plaintiff Daniel Rausch.. (Wenzel, Mark) |
| Filing 10 Joint CASE MANAGEMENT REPORT by Plaintiff Daniel Rausch. (Wenzel, Mark) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of FRCP 26 Meeting by Daniel Rausch.. (Wenzel, Mark) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER TO FILE JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT REPORT - The parties shall file a joint case management report by no later than Monday, November 27, 2023. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin on 10/10/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HL) (Main Document 8 replaced on 10/10/2023) (HL).
|
| Filing 7 CIVIL STANDING ORDER - MAGISTRATE JUDGE CARLA BALDWIN. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HL) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER re #1 Petition for Removal,, filed by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. Certificate of Interested Parties due by 10/20/2023. Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order due by 11/24/2023.(Harper, James) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Daniel Rausch. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Wenzel, Mark) |
| Filing 4 STATEMENT REGARDING REMOVAL by Defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company.. (Harper, James) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Harper, James) |
| Filing 2 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge Larry R. Hicks on 10/3/2023. Statement regarding removed action is due by 10/18/2023. Joint Status Report regarding removed action is due by 11/2/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM) |
| Case randomly assigned to Judge Larry R. Hicks and Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin. (DRM) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL from District Court, Case Number CV23-01529, (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANVDC-7445897) by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. Certificate of Interested Parties due by 10/12/2023. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Harper, James) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Rausch v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Daniel Rausch | |
| Represented By: | Mark C. Wenzel |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | James Ernest Harper |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
