Hernandez v. Dzurenda et al
Fernando Navarro Hernandez |
James E. Dzurenda, Erica Ceballos, (FNU) Barreti, Lorenzo Villegas, Roxanne Bybee, Dr. Ted Hanf, Gregory Martin, Michelle Perkins, Elizabeth Pritchard, Warden William Gittere, David Rivas, Joseph Benson and (FNU) Bernales |
3:2024cv00001 |
January 2, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Carla Baldwin |
Anne R Traum |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 NOTICE of Change of Address, by Law Library - Northern NV CC. Old address: Ely State Prison. New address: Northern NV CC. (GA) |
Filing 3 ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. (DLS) |
Filing 2 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Fernando Navarro Hernandez. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Motion to Dispense, #3 Motion for Appointment of Counsel, #4 Motion, #5 Affidavit, #6 Memorandum, #7 Injunction/Temporary Restraining, #8 Receipt of Copy, #9 Envelope)(DLS) |
Filing 1 GENERAL ORDER 2012-01. In the Matter of: Mandatory Electronic Submission of NDOC Prisoner Documents. Order sent to Plaintiff. Law librarian: please provide a copy of this order to Fernando Navarro Hernandez. (DRM) |
Case randomly assigned to District Judge Anne R. Traum and Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin. (DRM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.