Winfrey v. Mitchell et al
| Leonard Winfrey |
| Melissa Mitchell, Gaylene Fukagawa, Vanessa, Kathy, Kellen, Jessica Rambur, John Kease, Benson, Lorenzo Villegas and John Henley |
| 3:2024cv00101 |
| February 28, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Carla Baldwin |
| Miranda M Du |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER - It is therefore ordered that Plaintiff's motion to dismiss (ECF No. #6 ) is denied without prejudice because it was filed in the wrong action.The Clerk of the Court is directed to add Case No. 3:24-cv-00104-LRH-CSD to the caption of Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. #6 ) and file that motion in Case No. 3:24-cv-00104-LRH-CSD. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 3/19/2024. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DLS)
|
| Filing 8 FINANCIAL CERTIFICATE by Plaintiff Leonard Winfrey. (DLS) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel by Plaintiff Leonard Winfrey. (DLS) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss by Plaintiff Leonard Winfrey. Responses due by 4/1/2024. (DLS) |
| Filing 5 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin on 3/18/2024. Plaintiff Leonard Winfrey with Inmate Number 48467 is an inmate in the custody of the Nevada Department of Corrections (NDOC) and is housed at Northern Nevada Correctional Center. Plaintiff has submitted an application to proceed in forma pauperis to the court. Plaintiff authorizes the NDOC to provide a copy of their trust fund account statement for activity covering the last six months to this court. The NDOC is ORDERED to file directly with the court the following documents pertaining to Plaintiff Leonard Winfrey: (a) current account balance, (b) average monthly account balance, and (c) average monthly deposits for the last six months by email to #docketreno@nvd.uscourts.gov. A copy of this order has been electronically sent to NDOC. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DLS) |
| Filing 4 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Leonard Winfrey. (DLS) |
| Filing 3 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin on 3/8/2024. Plaintiff has neither paid the full $405 filing fee for this case nor submitted a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis on this court's approved form. See 28 U.S.C. 1914, 1915(a)(1)(2); Nev. Loc. Special R. 1-2. The Clerk of the Court will send to Plaintiff the approved form application to proceed in forma pauperis by an inmate at NNCC and instructions for the same. (Sent on 3/8/2024) Plaintiff has until April 8, 2024 to pay the full $405 filing fee or file a fullycomplete application to proceed in forma pauperis, which includes pages 13 of thecourt's approved form and is properly signed by Plaintiff on page 3. Plaintiff is cautioned that this action may be dismissed without prejudice if Plaintiff fails to timelycomply with this order. (Attachments: #1 IFP form with Instructions)(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - GA) |
| Filing 2 ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. (GA) |
| Filing 1 RECEIPT of Initiating Documents by Court on behalf of Plaintiff. No Application to Proceed IFP or Filing Fee received. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Motion for Counsel) (GA) |
| Case randomly assigned to Chief Judge Miranda M. Du and Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin. (GA) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
