Gurner et al v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
| John Gurner, Michelle Gurner, Claire Gurner and Cameron Gurner |
| American Family Mutual Insurance Company |
| 3:2024cv00158 |
| April 4, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Defendant American Family Mutual Insurance Company. (Carlson, Jonathan) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by American Family Mutual Insurance Company that identifies all parties that have an interest in the outcome of this case. Corporate Parent American Family Insurance for American Family Mutual Insurance Company added. (Carlson, Jonathan) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL from Second Judicial District Court, Washoe County, Case Number CV24-00487, (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ANVDC-7641463) by American Family Mutual Insurance Company. Certificate of Interested Parties due by 4/14/2024. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (Carlson, Jonathan) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
