Coast to Coast Hole in One, LLC et al v. Higgins et al
| Coast to Coast Hole in One, LLC, Terry Ulleseit and Denise I George |
| Michael Higgins, Tracy Higgins and Hole in One Promotions, LLC |
| 3:2024cv00195 |
| April 30, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 14, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Michael Higgins, Tracy Higgins, Hole in One Promotions, LLC. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Arger, Anthony) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL from Second Judicial District Court, Case Number CV24-00841, (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ANVDC-7669556) by Michael Higgins, Hole in One Promotions, LLC, Tracy Higgins. Certificate of Interested Parties due by 5/10/2024. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit, #8 Exhibit, #9 Exhibit, #10 Exhibit, #11 Exhibit, #12 Exhibit, #13 Exhibit, #14 Exhibit, #15 Exhibit, #16 Exhibit, #17 Exhibit, #18 Exhibit) (Arger, Anthony) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
