Davis v. Cooke et al
Terrance Davis |
Andrew and Tasheena Cooke |
3:2024cv00229 |
June 4, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Craig S Denney |
Miranda M Du |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Terrance Davis. (DLS) |
Filing 3 ORDER - It is therefore ordered that Plaintiff has until August 13, 2024, to either pay the full $405 filing fee or file a fully complete application to proceed in forma pauperis with all three required documents. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send Plaintiff Terrance Davis the approved form application to proceed in forma pauperis for an inmate and instructions for the same, and to retain the complaint (ECF No. #1 -1) but not file it at this time. Signed by Magistrate Judge Craig S. Denney on 6/14/2024. (For Distribution by law library.) (Attachments: #1 IFP form/Instruction)(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DLS) |
Filing 2 ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. (For Distribution by law library.) (DRM) |
Filing 1 RECEIPT of Initiating Documents by Court on behalf of Plaintiff. No Application to Proceed IFP or Filing Fee received. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Financial Certificates) (DRM) |
Case randomly assigned to Chief Judge Miranda M. Du and Magistrate Judge Craig S. Denney. (DRM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.