Christensen v. Findlay ARN, LLC et al
Barry James Christensen, II |
Justin Findlay, Findlay Automotive Inc. and Findlay ARN, LLC doing business as Audi Reno Tahoe |
3:2024cv00371 |
August 19, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Carla Baldwin |
Anne R Traum |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. (GA) |
Filing 3 PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued by Plaintiff Barry James Christensen, II. (GA) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $405 paid; Receipt #3-645) by Barry James Christensen, II. Certificate of Interested Parties due by 8/29/2024. Proof of service due by 11/17/2024. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Receipt, #4 Summons to be Issued) (GA) |
Filing 1 CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 16-6 this case has been assigned to the Early Neutral Evaluation Program. Magistrate Judge Craig S. Denney will be the evaluating judge in this case. No ENE will be conducted in cases subject to arbitration. Parties to cases subject to mandatory arbitration, as well as parties who agree to arbitrate, must notify the Court of the same no later than 14 days after the date of this Notice. Failure to do so may result in sanctions. (no image attached) (GA) |
Case randomly assigned to District Judge Anne R. Traum and Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin. (GA) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.