Gardner et al v. Sage Ridge School
| Jelani Gardner and J. Doe |
| Sage Ridge School |
| 3:2024cv00403 |
| September 6, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Carla Baldwin |
| Anne R Traum |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 31, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 RESPONSE to #9 Motion to Dismiss by Plaintiff Jelani Gardner. Replies due by 11/7/2024. (Jepsen, Kendra) |
Filing 14
ORDER GRANTING ECF No. #13 Amended Stipulation re Motion Briefing Schedule : Response to ECF No. #9 Motion to Dismiss due by 10/31/2024. Reply due by 11/14/2024. Signed by District Judge Anne R. Traum on 10/29/2024. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
| Filing 13 Amended STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (First Request) re #11 Stipulation, #12 Order on Stipulation,,, by Plaintiffs J. Doe, Jelani Gardner. (Jepsen, Kendra) (extend) (sumjgm) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER granting #11 Stipulation for Extension of Time. Response re #9 Motion to Dismiss is due by 10/31/2024. Replies due by 11/7/2024. Signed by District Judge Anne R. Traum on 10/25/2024. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DLS)
|
| Filing 11 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (First Request) by Plaintiffs J. Doe, Jelani Gardner. (Jepsen, Kendra) (extend) (sumjgm) |
| Filing 10 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Sage Ridge School. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Snow, John) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss #1 Complaint,, by Defendant Sage Ridge School. Responses due by 10/24/2024. (Snow, John) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Association of Counsel by Kendra J. Jepsen on behalf of Plaintiffs J. Doe, Jelani Gardner. (Jepsen, Kendra) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jelani Gardner, J. Doe. All Plaintiffs. (Gilbert, Joseph) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney John A. Snow on behalf of Defendant Sage Ridge School. (Snow, John) |
| Filing 5 CLERK'S NOTICE that this case is randomly reassigned to Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin for all further proceedings. All further documents must bear the correct case number 3:24-cv-00403-ART-CLB. (no image attached) (DLS) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER - With good cause appearing, the Honorable Magistrate Judge Craig S. Denney recuses himself in this action. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk shall draw another Magistrate Judge to be assigned to this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Craig S. Denney on 9/11/2024. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DLS)
|
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by J. Doe, Jelani Gardner. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Chattah, Sigal) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Sage Ridge School. (DLS) |
| Case randomly assigned to District Judge Anne R. Traum and Magistrate Judge Craig S. Denney. (DLS) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $405 receipt number ANVDC-7801394) by Jelani Gardner, J. Doe. Certificate of Interested Parties due by 9/16/2024. Proof of service due by 12/5/2024. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons) (Gilbert, Joseph) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
