Olsen v. US Department of Education et al
| Rost Conor Olsen |
| US Department of Education and Secretary Linda McMahon |
| 3:2026cv00543 |
| July 15, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Craig S Denney |
| Anne R Traum |
| Mandamus & Other |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 702 Administrative Procedure Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 9, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable District Judge Anne R. Traum on 9/9/2026. On August 6, 2026, Plaintiff filed a motion for preliminary injunction. (ECF No. 9.) A response was due by August 20, 2026. Defendants failed to meet that deadline. On September 2, 2026, Plaintiff filed a subsequent motion for temporary restraining order. (ECF No. 14.) The Court orders Defendants to file a response to Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction and motion for temporary restraining order by September 16, 2026. (no image attached) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AGM) |
| Filing 14 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order re #9 Motion for Preliminary Injunction by Plaintiff Rost Conor Olsen. Responses are due by 9/17/2026. (Attachments: #1 Declaration ISO Motion)(Olsen, Rost) |
| Filing 13 ADDENDUM to #10 Summons Returned Executed as to USA by Plaintiff Rost Conor Olsen. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Return Receipt US Atty, #2 Exhibit Return Receipt USAG, #3 Exhibit Return Receipt McMahon/DoEd, #4 Exhibit Amended Certificate of Service)(Olsen, Rost) |
| Filing 12 NON-OPPOSITION to #9 Motion for Preliminary Injunction by Plaintiff Rost Conor Olsen. (Olsen, Rost) |
| Filing 11 ADDENDUM to #7 Errata by Plaintiff Rost Conor Olsen. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit)(Olsen, Rost) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Rost Conor Olsen re #5 Summons Issued as to USA, #1 Complaint,,. All Defendants. (Olsen, Rost) |
| Filing 9 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Plaintiff Rost Conor Olsen. Responses are due by 8/20/2026. (Attachments: #1 Index Index of Exhibits, #2 Appendix Appendix of Exhibits, #3 Certificate of Service)(Olsen, Rost) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of No Opposition to ECF No. 3 by Rost Conor Olsen. (Olsen, Rost) |
| Filing 7 ERRATA to #6 Summons Returned Executed as to USA by Plaintiff Rost Conor Olsen. (Olsen, Rost) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Rost Conor Olsen re #5 Summons Issued as to USA, #1 Complaint,,. All Defendants. (Olsen, Rost) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Linda McMahon, US Department of Education re #1 Complaint. (HAM) |
| Filing 4 PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued by Plaintiff Rost Conor Olsen. (Olsen, Rost) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Rost Conor Olsen. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Olsen, Rost) |
| Filing 1 First COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $405 receipt number ANVDC-8608513) by Rost Conor Olsen. Certificate of Interested Parties is due by 7/26/2026. Proof of service is due by 10/14/2026. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Proposed Summons) (Olsen, Rost) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
| Case randomly assigned to District Judge Anne R. Traum and Magistrate Judge Craig S. Denney. (HAM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
