Lena Carillo v. US Foods Holding Corp et al
| Lena Carillo |
| US Foods Holding Corp, Jeremiah Relaford, Sherry Mack, Joshua Ronald Vaith and US Foods, Inc. |
| 3:2026cv00546 |
| July 16, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Craig S Denney |
| Anne R Traum |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 19, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 TRANSMITTAL RETURN. Transferred case opened in Eastern District of California as case 2:26-cv-02821 on 8/19/2026. (RJDG) |
| Filing 12 TRANSMITTAL of case to the Eastern District of California. Case and docket sheet transferred electronically. (no image attached) (DLS) |
Filing 11
ORDER Granting #9 Joint Stipulation to Change Venue. Signed by District Judge Anne R. Traum on 8/18/2026.(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DLS)
|
| Filing 10 Joint STATUS REPORT in Compliance with Docket 3 by Plaintiff Lena Carillo. (Bayramoglu, Nihat) |
| Filing 9 Joint MOTION to Change Venue or Transfer. Stipulation and Order Responses are due by 8/31/2026. (Bayramoglu, Nihat) |
| Filing 8 STATEMENT REGARDING REMOVAL by Defendants Sherry Mack, Jeremiah Relaford, US Foods Holding Corp, US Foods, Inc., Joshua Ronald Vaith. (Grigg, Dana) |
| Filing 7 CIVIL STANDING ORDER of U.S. Magistrate Judge Craig S. Denney. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HJ) |
| Filing 6 CIVIL COVER SHEET to #1 Petition for Removal,,, by Defendants Sherry Mack, Jeremiah Relaford, US Foods Holding Corp, US Foods, Inc., Joshua Ronald Vaith. (Grigg, Dana) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE: Attorney Action Required to #1 Petition for Removal. Attorney J Randall Stephenson advised to review and comply with LR IA 11-1(a) and LR IC 2-1. (no image attached) (WJ) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE: Attorney Action Required to #1 Petition for Removal. Attorney Dana Grigg advised to review and comply with LR 3-1 and file a properly completed civil cover sheet. (no image attached) (WJ) |
| Filing 3 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable District Judge Anne R. Traum on 7/17/2026. Statement regarding removed action is due by 8/1/2026. Joint Status Report regarding removed action is due by 8/16/2026. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - WJ) |
| Case randomly assigned to District Judge Anne R. Traum and Magistrate Judge Craig S. Denney. (WJ) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Sherry Mack, Jeremiah Relaford, US Foods Holding Corp, US Foods, Inc., Joshua Ronald Vaith. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Grigg, Dana) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL from Second Judicial District Court, Case Number CV26-01027, (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ANVDC-8610755) by US Foods, Inc., Sherry Mack, Jeremiah Relaford, US Foods Holding Corp, Joshua Ronald Vaith. Proof of service is due by 7/1/2026. Certificate of Interested Parties is due by 7/26/2026. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J) (Grigg, Dana) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
