Lena Carillo v. US Foods Holding Corp et al
| Lena Carillo |
| US Foods Holding Corp, Jeremiah Relaford, Sherry Mack, Joshua Ronald Vaith and US Foods, Inc. |
| 3:2026cv00546 |
| July 16, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 16, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Sherry Mack, Jeremiah Relaford, US Foods Holding Corp, US Foods, Inc., Joshua Ronald Vaith. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Grigg, Dana) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL from Second Judicial District Court, Case Number CV26-01027, (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ANVDC-8610755) by US Foods, Inc., Sherry Mack, Jeremiah Relaford, US Foods Holding Corp, Joshua Ronald Vaith. Proof of service is due by 7/1/2026. Certificate of Interested Parties is due by 7/26/2026. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J) (Grigg, Dana) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.