Wilson v. Montano et al
Michael Wilson, Sr. |
Lawrence Montano, FNU Torres, John Doe, Joe Chavez and Rene Rivera |
1:2011cv00658 |
July 27, 2011 |
US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
Albuquerque Office |
Valencia |
Bruce D. Black |
Karen B. Molzen |
Other Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 285 FINAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL by District Judge Kenneth J. Gonzales. (tah) |
Filing 279 PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION by Magistrate Judge Steven C. Yarbrough on 251 Motion to Dismiss filed by Joe Chavez, Rene Rivera, Lawrence Montano, and 237 Joint Motion for Sanctions filed by Dan Robb, Joe Chavez, Rene Rivera , Louis Burkhard, Mike Chavez, Derek Williams, Joseph Chavez. Objections to PFRD due by 2/2/2018. Add 3 days to the deadline if service is by mailing it to the person's last known address (or means described in Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b)(2)(D) and (F)); if service is by electronic means, no additional days are added. (Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(d); Fed. R. Crim. P. 45(c).) (hm) |
Filing 175 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by District Judge Kenneth J. Gonzales granting 157 Defendant Roy Cordova's Motion to Dismiss in Lieu of an Answer. (tah) |
Filing 165 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by District Judge Kenneth J. Gonzales granting 123 Motion for Summary Judgment on Claims Asserted Against Defendant Dan Robb. (tah) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.