New Mexico Oncology and Hematology Consultants, Ltd. v. Presbyterian Healthcare Services et al
||New Mexico Oncology and Hematology Consultants, Ltd.
||Presbyterian Healthcare Services and Presbyterian Network, Inc.
||May 16, 2012
||New Mexico District Court
||W. Daniel Schneider
||Gregory B. Wormuth
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|November 5, 2018
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by District Judge Martha Vazquez. In sum, in consideration of the foregoing, the Court awards Plaintiff fees in the amount of $499,335.99. (gr)
|March 28, 2018
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Gregory B. Wormuth. The Court awards Plaintiff fees in the amount of $179,840 pursuant to 745 , 753 and 768 . (bni)
|February 21, 2018
ORDER ADOPTING 745 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by District Judge Martha Vazquez; OVERRULING 756 Objections, filed by New Mexico Oncology and Hematology Consultants, Ltd.; DENYING 791 Reply to Response to Motion, filed by New Mexico Oncology and Hematology Consultants, Ltd.. (gr)
|September 25, 2017
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Gregory B. Wormuth granting in part and denying in part 575 Motion to Compel; adopting in part 609 Special Master's Second Report and Recommendations; granting 621 Defendant's Motion to Modify the Special Master's Second R&R; granting in part 622 Plaintiff's Motion to Adopt Special Master's Second R&R. (bni)
|August 16, 2017
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION by Magistrate Judge Gregory B. Wormuth re 673 MOTION for Sanctions. (twr)
|February 27, 2017
SECOND REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION by Special Master Alan C. Torgerson. (mjr)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?