Auld v. Central New Mexico Community College et al
| Riema Auld |
| Central New Mexico Community College, Pam Etre-Perez, Tom Pierce, William Heenan, Carol Adler, Tom Manning and Kathy Winograd |
| 1:2014cv00636 |
| July 11, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| Albuquerque Office |
| Bernalillo |
| Robert Hayes Scott |
| Steven C. Yarbrough |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
76
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by District Judge Kenneth J. Gonzales denying 70 MOTION for Reconsideration, 71 Notice (Other), 72 MOTION for Order, 73 MOTION for Order, 74 MOTION to Appoint Counsel, and 75 Notice (Other). (tah)
|
|
Filing
66
ORDER by District Judge Kenneth J. Gonzales denying 63 Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed on Appeal in forma pauperis. (tah)
|
|
Filing
61
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by District Judge Kenneth J. Gonzales denying 45 Plaintiff's Motion for Injunction; denying as moot Plaintiff's remaining filings ( 47 Motion to Appoint Counsel, 48 Notice of Exhibit, 52 Motion for Orde r, 54 Amended Complaint, 56 Motion for Order, 57 Appendix/Supplement, 58 Notification of Evidence); and denying 55 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim and Lack of Jurisdiction. This case remains closed as of June 30, 2015. (tah)
|
|
Filing
60
ORDER STAYING CASE by District Judge Kenneth J. Gonzales. (tah)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
