Coyne et al v. Los Alamos National Security, LLC et al
| Suzanne D. Coyne and Robert J. Coyne |
| Los Alamos National Security LLC, Nicholas Degidio, Gail McGuire and Jackie Little |
| 1:2015cv00054 |
| January 20, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| Albuquerque Office |
| Los Alamos |
| Kirtan Khalsa |
| Steven C. Yarbrough |
| Family and Medical Leave Act |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
154
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 146 ; granting 136 Motion for Sanctions; and denying 150 Motion to Strike Reply by Magistrate Judge Steven C. Yarbrough. (cm)
|
|
Filing
146
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Chief Magistrate Judge Karen B. Molzen re 136 Defendants' Motion for Dismissal with Prejudice as Sanction for Plaintiffs Willful Destruction of Evidence. Objections to R&R due by 4/4/2017. < FONT SIZE=-1>Add 3 days to the deadline if service is by mailing it to the person's last known address (or means described in Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b)(2)(D) and (F)); if service is by electronic means, no additional days are added. (Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(d); Fed. R. Crim. P. 45(c).) (KBM)
|
|
Filing
133
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Chief Magistrate Judge Karen B. Molzen granting in part and denying in part 127 Defendant LANS' Second Motion to Compel. (mlt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
