Romero v. AJF Enterprises, Inc. et al
| Irene Romero |
| AJF Enterprises, Inc. and Arthur Famiglietta |
| 1:2016cv00038 |
| January 15, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| Albuquerque Office |
| Sandoval |
| Kirtan Khalsa |
| William P Lynch |
| Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2003 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
129
FINAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL by District Judge Kenneth J. Gonzales. (tah)
|
|
Filing
120
ORDER by District Judge Kenneth J. Gonzales granting 119 Unopposed Motion for Partial Dismissal with Prejudice. (tah)
|
|
Filing
109
ORDER by District Judge Kenneth J. Gonzales denying without prejudice Defendants' request for reasonable attorney's fees and costs; an amended brief on reasonable attorney's fees and costs consistent with the rulings in this Memorandum Opinion and Order must be filed within fourteen days of the entry of this Memorandum Opinion and Order; and Plaintiff may file a response brief fourteen days after the filing of Defendants' brief. (tah)
|
|
Filing
96
ORDER by District Judge Kenneth J. Gonzales denying 62 Motion to Dismiss; granting 63 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply; denying 72 Motion for Sanctions. (tah)
|
|
Filing
70
ORDER by Magistrate Judge William P. Lynch. In-Person Status Conference set for 12/16/2016 at 09:00 AM in Albuquerque - 440 Hondo Courtroom before Magistrate Judge William P. Lynch. (mej)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
