Schueller v. Wells Fargo & Company

Schueller v. Wells Fargo & Company

Plaintiff:	Norbert A. Schueller
Defendant:	Wells Fargo & Company
Case Number:	1:2016cv00107
Filed:	February 12, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the District of New Mexico
Office:	Albuquerque Office
County:	Valencia
Presiding Judge:	Karen B. Molzen
Presiding Judge:	Martha Vazquez
Nature of Suit:	Other Personal Property Damage
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 12, 2018	Filing 42 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Karen B. Molzen granting in part 39 Wells Fargo's MOTION for Attorney Fees and Costs. (KBM)
March 28, 2018	Filing 36 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by District Judge Martha Vazquez GRANTING 11 MOTION for Sanctions (Rule 11); and GRANTING 10 MOTION to Dismiss . IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Wells Fargo & Company's Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 10 ] and Wells Fargo and Company's Rule 11 Motion for Sanctions [Doc. 11 ] are GRANTED, as follows: this action is dismissed with prejudice and reasonable attorney's fees and costs will be awarded to Wells Fargo as described herein, in an amount to be determined by the Court following submission of the required documentation by Wells Fargo and after consideration of any timely-filed objections by Plaintiff. (gr)

Date Filed

Document Text

June 12, 2018

Filing 42 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Karen B. Molzen granting in part 39 Wells Fargo's MOTION for Attorney Fees and Costs. (KBM)

March 28, 2018

Filing 36 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by District Judge Martha Vazquez GRANTING 11 MOTION for Sanctions (Rule 11); and GRANTING 10 MOTION to Dismiss . IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Wells Fargo & Company's Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 10 ] and Wells Fargo and Company's Rule 11 Motion for Sanctions [Doc. 11 ] are GRANTED, as follows: this action is dismissed with prejudice and reasonable attorney's fees and costs will be awarded to Wells Fargo as described herein, in an amount to be determined by the Court following submission of the required documentation by Wells Fargo and after consideration of any timely-filed objections by Plaintiff. (gr)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Schueller v. Wells Fargo & Company
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Norbert A. Schueller
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Wells Fargo & Company
Represented By:	Allison Louise Biles
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?