Cordova v. Jenkins et al
Plaintiff: Joshua Cordova
Defendant: Jody Jenkins and Jenkins, Wagnon & Young, P.C.
Case Number: 1:2016cv00460
Filed: May 20, 2016
Court: US District Court for the District of New Mexico
Office: Albuquerque Office
County: Bernalillo
Presiding Judge: Kenneth J. Gonzales
Presiding Judge: Karen B. Molzen
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 11, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 119 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OF REMAND by District Judge Kenneth J. Gonzales. (tah)
October 19, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 108 AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by District Judge Kenneth J. Gonzales amending 104 Memorandum Opinion and Order; and vacating 106 Order of Remand. (tah)
October 11, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 106 ORDER OF REMAND by District Judge Kenneth J. Gonzales. This lawsuit is remanded to the Second Judicial District Court, County of Bernalillo, State of New Mexico. (tah)
April 6, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 102 ORDER by District Judge Kenneth J. Gonzales denying 87 Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Motions for Summary Judgment. (tah)
March 13, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 95 ORDER by District Judge Kenneth J. Gonzales granting 92 Unopposed Motion for Leave to Exceed Page Limits for Defendants' Reply to Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Plaintiff's Claims Under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and the New Mexico Unfair Practices Act. (tah)
February 14, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 82 ORDER by District Judge Kenneth J. Gonzales granting 81 Unopposed Motion for Leave to Exceed Page Limits for his Reply to Motion for Class Certification. Reply not to exceed 18 pages. (tah)
January 10, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 72 ORDER by District Judge Kenneth J. Gonzales granting 71 Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages. (tah)
January 2, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 69 ORDER by District Judge Kenneth J. Gonzales granting 68 Stipulated Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Claim for Fraud. (tah)
April 20, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 18 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by District Judge Kenneth J. Gonzales denying 5 Defendants' Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss and Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. (tah)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cordova v. Jenkins et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joshua Cordova
Represented By: Richard N. Feferman
Represented By: Nicholas H. Mattison
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jody Jenkins
Represented By: Charles J. Vigil
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jenkins, Wagnon & Young, P.C.
Represented By: Charles J. Vigil
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?