Burke v. State of New Mexico, et al
| Heather Burke |
| State of New Mexico, Edwynn Burckle, Jay Hone, Michael Gallegos, Angela Dawson, Brenda Gueths and Karen Baltzley |
| 1:2016cv00470 |
| May 23, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| Albuquerque Office |
| Santa Fe |
| Karen B. Molzen |
| Stephan M. Vidmar |
| Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
336
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar DENYING without prejudice 331 Defendants' Motion Requesting that Documents Subject to Confidentiality Order Attached as Exhibits to Defendant Angela Dawson's Declaration Be Filed Under Seal. (jcm)
|
|
Filing
297
ORDER OF REFERENCE by Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar. This matter is referred to Karen B. Molzen, United States Magistrate Judge, to facilitate settlement. (am)
|
|
Filing
292
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar DENYING 230 Plaintiff's Motion and Memorandum in Support of Partial Summary Judgment on Count I: Fair Pay for Women Act and Count III: Inspection of Public Records Act. (jcm)
|
|
Filing
254
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar DENYING 149 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment on Count IV—FMLA Interference. (jcm)
|
|
Filing
248
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar GRANTING IN PART and DENYING IN PART 231 Defendants' Motion to Limit Summary Judgment Briefing and to Deny Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Counts I and III Without Prejudice. (jcm)
|
|
Filing
225
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar GRANTING 220 Defendant Dawson's Motion for Leave to File Surreply to Plaintiff's Reply in Support of Her Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Count IV: FMLA Interference. Dawson may file her surreply no later than September 25, 2019, at 12:00 p.m. (jcm)
|
|
Filing
170
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar GRANTING IN PART and DENYING IN PART 157 Defendants' Request for Additional Discovery Under Rule 56(d). Defendants must file a response to 149 Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment no later than August 30, 2019. Plaintiff may file a reply no later than 14 days after the response is filed. (jcm)
|
|
Filing
105
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar DENYING 96 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim and DENYING 99 Plaintiff's Motion to Strike. (jcm)
|
|
Filing
93
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by District Judge M. Christina Armijo. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiffs objections to Magistrate Judges Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition [Doc. 91] are OVERRULED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Magistrate Judges Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition [Doc. 90] are ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs Third Motion for Leave to Amend [Doc. 77] is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. It is GRANTED a s to Plaintiffs IPRA claim against Defendant GSD and her FMLA claim against Defendant Dawson. It is DENIED in all other respects. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, within 21 days of entry of this Order, Plaintiff file an amended complaint consistent with the foregoing. (kg)
|
|
Filing
90
PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION by Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar to GRANT IN PART AND DENY IN PART 77 Plaintiff's [Third] Motion for Leave to Amend. Objections to PF&RD are due by May 23, 2018. Add 3 days to the deadline if service is by mailing it to the person's last known address (or means described in Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b)(2)(D) and (F)); if service is by electronic means, no additional days are added. (Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(d); Fed. R. Crim. P. 45(c).) (sg)
|
|
Filing
80
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar DENYING as moot 56 Defendants' Motion to Strike; DENYING as moot 59 Plaintiff's First Motion for Leave to Amend; DENYING as moot 76 Plaintiff's Second Motion for Leave to Amend; GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 78 Defendants' Motion to Stay; and ORDERING Defendants to respond to 77 Plaintiff's [Third] Motion for Leave to Amend by January 12, 2018. (sg)
|
|
Filing
79
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar DENYING 66 Plaintiff's Motion for Discovery and DENYING as moot 67 Defendants' Motion to Quash Subpoena. (sg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
