McKenzie v. United States of America
| Richard Anthony McKenzie |
| United States of America |
| 1:2016cv00740 |
| June 28, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| Albuquerque Office |
| Bernalillo |
| James O. Browning |
| Karen B. Molzen |
| Motions to Vacate Sentence |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
20
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by District Judge James O. Browning transferring the Petitioner, Mckenzie's Second Supplemental Motion to His Request for Habeas Relief Under Title 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1613 18 ; and, denying the Petitioner, Mckenzie's Motion for Leave to Construe His Motion to Amend His § 2255 Petition Under Rule 15(c) to a Motion for Reconsideration Under Rule 59(e) 19 . (mnb)
|
|
Filing
16
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by District Judge James O. Browning, the Defendant/Movant's Motion to Correct Sentence Under 28 U.S.C. section 2255, 1 the Defendant/Movant's Supplemental Motion to Correct Sentence Under 28 U.S.C. section 2255, 6 are dismissed with prejudice. (meq)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER LIFTING STAY by Magistrate Judge Karen B. Molzen. Parties shall confer on the question of whether the Supreme Court's ruling in Beckles is dispositive of all issues raised in this § 2255 proceeding and file a joint statement advising the Court of the results of their conference within fourteen (14) days of entry of this Order. (KBM)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER by Chief Magistrate Judge Karen B. Molzen granting 8 Motion for Stay of Proceedings Pending the Supreme Court's Decision in Beckles v. United States, (S. Ct. No. 15-8544. (KBM)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER by Chief Magistrate Judge Karen B. Molzen that Defendant McKenzie will be given the opportunity to file by January 18, 2017, a supplemental brief addressing whether the granting of the 8 United States' MOTION for Order to Stay Proceedings Pending The Supreme Court's Decision in United States v. Beckles will effectively deny him of his right to timely resolution of the § 2255 motion. (KBM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: McKenzie v. United States of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Richard Anthony McKenzie | |
| Represented By: | Jason Bowles |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Samuel A. Hurtado |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
