EmployBridge, LLC et al v. Riven Rock Staffing, LLC et al
EmployBridge, LLC and Employment Solutions Management, Inc. |
Riven Rock Staffing, LLC, Larry Shaun Shepherd, Catherine Olinger, Terry Miller, Timothy Jacquez and Does |
1:2016cv00833 |
July 20, 2016 |
US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
Albuquerque Office |
-OUT OF STATE- |
William P. Johnson |
Kirtan Khalsa |
Other Contract |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 128 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by District Judge William P. Johnson GRANTING 108 MOTION to Stay re 104 MOTION for Summary Judgment on City of Albuquerque Contract & Supporting Memorandum, 105 MOTION for Summary Judgment & Memorandum on Counts I, IV-XII on Non-City of Albuquerque Claims Ruling on Summa as further described herein. (kg) |
Filing 88 ORDER ON DISCOVERY MOTIONS REGARDING SUBPOENAS by Magistrate Judge Kirtan Khalsa. Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel Compliance with Subpoenas or, in the Alternative, to Transfer (Misc. Civ. No. 16-45 WJ, Doc. 1) and Emergency Motion to Enforce Subpoenas against Non-Party Sorensen (Doc. 63) are granted in part and denied in part. The parties' Joint Motion for Hearing (Doc. 80) is denied. (kmt) |
Filing 69 ORDER DENYING MOTION to Compel Defendant Riven Rock Staffing, LLC to Respond to Interrogatories, Set One, Nos. 11-14 and Produce Documents In Response To Request for Production, Set One, Nos. 15-24 by Magistrate Judge Kirtan Khalsa. (KK) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.