Diab v. Doe et al
| Richard Diab |
| John Doe, New Mexico Department of Corrections, FNU Baca and Ken Smith |
| 1:2016cv01002 |
| September 7, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| Albuquerque Office |
| Valencia |
| M. Christina Armijo |
| Gregory J. Fouratt |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
80
PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION re 1 Complaint filed by Richard Diab and 60 Martinez Report filed by New Mexico Corrections Department by Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Fouratt. Objections to R&R due by 5/21/2018. (kdj)
|
|
Filing
75
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Fouratt granting 74 Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to File Response. Response due by 2/16/2018. Reply due by 3/2/2018. NO FURTHER EXTENSION OF THESE DEADLINES SHALL BE ALLOWED. (kdj)
|
|
Filing
56
ORDER FOR MARTINEZ REPORT by Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Fouratt. Martinez Report Due 10/26/2017. (kdj)
|
|
Filing
55
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 52 MOTION for Default Judgment by Chief Judge M. Christina Armijo. (vv)
|
|
Filing
51
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 49 MOTION for Summary Judgment by Chief Judge M. Christina Armijo. (vv)
|
|
Filing
47
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying as moot 6 14 ; denying 17 18] 19 32 38 44 45 46 by Chief Judge M. Christina Armijo. (vv)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
