Cordova v. State of New Mexico, et al.
| Louis T Cordova |
| State of New Mexico, Eduardo Lopez, Carol Hilton and Deinna Dures |
| 1:2016cv01144 |
| October 17, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| Albuquerque Office |
| Bernalillo |
| William P Lynch |
| Karen B. Molzen |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
102
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Senior District Judge James A. Parker granting and denying in part 77 MOTION for Summary Judgment on Count I--FMLA Interference and denying 78 MOTION for Summary Judgment on All Remaining Counts. (bap)
|
|
Filing
51
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Senior District Judge James A. Parker granting and denying in part 29 MOTION to Dismiss All Counts of the Complaint and Points and Authorities in Support Thereof ; granting as to Counts I, II and III against defendant UNMH and Count VI as to all defendants; and denying in all other respects. (bap)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER by Magistrate Judge William P. Lynch VACATING settlement conference set for 7/27/2017. (mej)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER by Magistrate Judge William P. Lynch granting 30 Motion to Stay Discovery. (mej)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER by Magistrate Judge William P. Lynch FOR EXPEDITED BRIEFING as to 30 MOTION to Stay Discovery filed by Deinna Dures, State of New Mexico, Carol Hilton, Eduardo Lopez. (mej)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
