Lunnon et al v. United States of America
Michael Lunnon and LG Kendrick, LLC |
United States of America |
1:2016cv01152 |
October 19, 2016 |
US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
Albuquerque Office |
McKinley |
Martha Vazquez |
Steven C. Yarbrough |
Taxes (US Plaintiff or Defendant) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1346 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 276 ORDER ADOPTING 272 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by District Judge Martha Vazquez GRANTING 247 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment filed by United States of America; DENYING 251 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Michael Lunnon. See order for specifics. (gr) |
Filing 272 PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION by Magistrate Judge John R. Robbenhaar re 247 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment regarding the remaining 6213 Cause of Action filed by United States of America and 251 MOTION for Summary Judgm ent Against United States filed by Michael Lunnon. Objections to R&R due by 7/22/2021. Add 3 days to the deadline if service is by mailing it to the person's last known address (or means described in Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b)(2)(D) and (F)); if service is by electronic means, no additional days are added. (Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(d); Fed. R. Crim. P. 45(c).) (kc) |
Filing 270 PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION by Magistrate Judge John F. Robbenhaar re 246 Opposed MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and Opposed MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by Michael Lunnon; and 249 MOTION for Summ ary Judgment on all the counterclaims filed by United States of America. Objections to PFRD due by 7/7/2021. Add 3 days to the deadline if service is by mailing it to the person's last known address (or means described in Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b)(2)(D) and (F)); if service is by electronic means, no additional days are added. (Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(d); Fed. R. Crim. P. 45(c).) (kc) |
Filing 253 ORDER ADOPTING 241 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by District Judge Martha Vazquez; GRANTING 197 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment filed by United States of America. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff's Objections are OVERRULED and the Magistrate Judge's Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition (Doc. 241 ) are ADOPTED; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the United States' Motion to Partial Summary Judgment on the Section 7433 Action (Doc. 197 ) is GRANTED. (gr) |
Filing 236 ORDER ADOPTING 231 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by District Judge Martha Vazquez; GRANTING 179 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiffs Objections are OVERRULED and the Magistrate Judge's Propos ed Findings and Recommended Disposition (Doc. 231 ) are ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that The UPS Store, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 179 ) is GRANTED and that the Sixth Cause of Action of Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (gr) |
Filing 227 ORDER Regarding Discovery Motions by Magistrate Judge John F. Robbenhaar denying 190 Motion to Compel; granting 193 Motion for Protective Order. (kc) |
Filing 154 ORDER ADOPTING 149 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by District Judge Martha Vazquez; OVERRULING 152 Objections filed by Michael Lunnon; GRANTING 123 Motion to Dismiss; and QUASHING 136 Order to Show Cause. See Order for Specifics. (gr) |
Filing 143 ORDER by District Judge Martha Vazquez ADOPTING 139 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS; GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 105 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; and DENYING 109 Motion to Strike. See Order for Specifics. (gr) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.