Gonzales v. Marcantell et al
| Nick James Gonzales |
| Gregg Marcantell, Centurion Health Care Providers, Jose Martinez and Tisha Romero |
| 1:2016cv01275 |
| November 21, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| Albuquerque Office |
| Santa Fe |
| Laura Fashing |
| William P. Johnson |
| Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
22
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by District Judge William P. Johnson. IT IS ORDERED: (1) Plaintiff Nick James Gonzaless Motion for Reconsideration on All Documents Along With Motion to Amend Complaint (Doc. 14), Plaintiff Gonzaless Petition for a Prote ctive Injunctive Preliminary Order (Doc. 19), Defendant Gregg Marcantels Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 3), and Defendant Marcantels Motion to Exclude Plaintiffs Request for an Order to Show Cause and Preliminary Injunction (Doc. 18) are DENIED; (2) All fed eral claims in Plaintiff Nick James Gonzaless Complaint (Tort) (Doc. 1 at 5-17) are DISMISSED for failure to state a claim for relief under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6); (3) The Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction and GRANTS Plaintiffs M otion to Deny and Dismiss Removal (Doc. 4) and Plaintiffs Second Motion to Deny and Dismiss Removal (Doc. 8); and (4) This case is REMANDED to the State of New Mexico, County of Santa Fe, First Judicial District Court for adjudication of Plaintiff Gonzales's state-law claims. (kg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
