Romero v. Social Security Administration

Justia Dockets & Filings Tenth Circuit New Mexico District Court Romero v. Social Security Administration

Romero v. Social Security Administration

Plaintiff:	Dolores A. Romero
Defendant:	Social Security Administration
Case Number:	1:2017cv00373
Filed:	March 27, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the District of New Mexico
Office:	Albuquerque Office
County:	Bernalillo
Presiding Judge:	James O. Browning
Presiding Judge:	William P Lynch
Nature of Suit:	Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 405
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 29, 2018	Filing 30 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by District Judge James O. Browning, denying 20 Plaintiff Dolores A. Romero's Motion to Reverse and Remand for Payment of Benefits, or in the Alternative, for Rehearing, with Supporting Memorandum, Overruling 28 Objections to Magistrate Judge's Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition and adopting in full 27 the Magistrate Judge's Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition (meq)
January 26, 2018	Filing 27 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 20 MOTION to Remand to Agency for Payment of Benefits, or in the Alternative, for Rehearing, filed by Dolores A. Romero by Magistrate Judge Jerry H. Ritter. Objections to R&R due by 2/9/2018. Add 3 days to the deadline if service is by mailing it to the person's last known address (or means described in Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b)(2)(D) and (F)); if service is by electronic means, no additional days are added. (Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(d); Fed. R. Crim. P. 45(c).) (mlt)

Date Filed

Document Text

June 29, 2018

Filing 30 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by District Judge James O. Browning, denying 20 Plaintiff Dolores A. Romero's Motion to Reverse and Remand for Payment of Benefits, or in the Alternative, for Rehearing, with Supporting Memorandum, Overruling 28 Objections to Magistrate Judge's Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition and adopting in full 27 the Magistrate Judge's Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition (meq)

January 26, 2018

Filing 27 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 20 MOTION to Remand to Agency for Payment of Benefits, or in the Alternative, for Rehearing, filed by Dolores A. Romero by Magistrate Judge Jerry H. Ritter. Objections to R&R due by 2/9/2018. Add 3 days to the deadline if service is by mailing it to the person's last known address (or means described in Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b)(2)(D) and (F)); if service is by electronic means, no additional days are added. (Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(d); Fed. R. Crim. P. 45(c).) (mlt)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Romero v. Social Security Administration
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dolores A. Romero
Represented By:	Francesca J. MacDowell
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Represented By:	Manuel Lucero
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?