Munoz v. John Doe Corporations
| Roy Munoz |
| John Doe Corporations |
| 1:2017cv00881 |
| August 25, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| Albuquerque Office |
| San Juan |
| Karen B. Molzen |
| Steven C. Yarbrough |
| Motor Vehicle Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
272
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OVERRULING 271 Response by Chief District Judge William P. Johnson. (cmm)
|
|
Filing
254
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Chief District Judge William P. Johnson GRANTING 200 Opposed MOTION for Summary Judgment FCA US LLC's Motion for Full and Final Summary Judgment. (cmm)
|
|
Filing
237
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Chief District Judge William P. Johnson granting 222 Opposed MOTION to Strike Affidavit of Jahan Rasty IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that parties are ordered to re-submit response and replybriefs to Defendants pending motion for summary judgment within the time frames given. (meq)
|
|
Filing
236
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Chief District Judge William P. Johnson, granting 221 Opposed MOTION to Strike Affidavit of Roy Munoz. (meq)
|
|
Filing
232
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Chief District Judge William P. Johnson, Denying Plaintiff's Daubert Motions 194 and 228 Seeking Exclusion of Defendant's Identified Expert, Robert Fucetola. (meq)
|
|
Filing
205
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Chief District Judge William P. Johnson GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 185 Motion to Exclude Impermissible Expert Testimony and Opinion Testimony of Dr. Candyce Tart and Dr. Richard Lanz. (mag)
|
|
Filing
169
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING APPEAL FROM MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S DISCOVERY ORDER by Chief District Judge William P. Johnson. (meq)
|
|
Filing
156
ORDER STAYING RULING ON EXPENSES by Magistrate Judge Steven C. Yarbrough. (kfo)
|
|
Filing
148
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Steven C. Yarbrough denying 141 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel. Defendant has 14 days from the date of this Order to file an affidavit outlining the expenses it incurred in responding to the Motion to Compel. Within 14 days after Defendant files its affidavit, Plaintiff may file any objections he has to the relief Defendant requests. (cm)
|
|
Filing
139
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Steven C. Yarbrough granting in part 116 Motion to Compel. (cm)
|
|
Filing
132
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Chief District Judge William P. Johnson DENYING 97 Opposed Motion to Amend/Correct Complaint By Interlineation; and GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 117 Defendants Motion to Strike Plaintiffs Expert Disclosures and Expert Report AS FURTHER DESCRIBED HEREIN. (mag)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Munoz v. John Doe Corporations | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Roy Munoz | |
| Represented By: | James P. Lyle |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: John Doe Corporations | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
