McNeese v. United States of America
Plaintiff: Mary F. McNeese
Defendant: United States of America
Case Number: 1:2017cv01164
Filed: November 27, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of New Mexico
Office: Albuquerque Office
County: Bernalillo
Presiding Judge: Laura Fashing
Presiding Judge: Kirtan Khalsa
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury- Medical Malpractice
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1346
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 183 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW by District Judge Margaret I. Strickland. (rcf)
January 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 135 ORDER by District Judge Margaret I. Strickland GRANTING 134 Defendant's unopposed Motion for Remote Witness Testimony. Counsel are advised to review the Court's safeguards outlined herein. (rcf)
November 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 127 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL by Magistrate Judge Kirtan Khalsa. Plaintiff's Motion to Compel a Report from Dr. Yoo on her Testimony in this Matter (Doc. 110) is denied. (kmt)
September 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 121 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by District Judge Kea W. Riggs. Plaintiff's 109 Motion for Leave to File Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is DENIED. (ve)
July 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 108 ORDER DENYING AS MOOT DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME by District Judge Kea W. Riggs. Defendant's [104} Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment, or in the Alternative, Motion for Extension of Time is DENIED AS MOOT. (ve)
July 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 102 ORDER SETTING EXPEDITED BRIEFING SCHEDULE by District Judge Kea W. Riggs. Defendant's response to Plaintiff's motion must be filed no later than July 19, 2021 by 5:00 p.m. Plaintiff's reply to Defendant's response must be filed no later than July 26, 2021 by 5:00 p.m. Briefing of Plaintiff's motion must be completed by July 30, 2021 by 5:00 p.m. with Plaintiff's counsel filing the appropriate Notice of Completing of Briefing for the motion. (ve)
June 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 98 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by District Judge Kea W. Riggs. The 90 Motion in Limine to Exclude Plaintiff's Expert Witness Testimony is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. (ve)
February 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 72 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REOPEN DISCOVERY by Magistrate Judge Kirtan Khalsa. (kys)
January 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 70 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by District Judge Kea W. Riggs Granting 42 Partial MOTION for Summary Judgment ; It Is Further ORDERED that the loss of consortium claim is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. (cmm)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McNeese v. United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mary F. McNeese
Represented By: John R. Polk
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?