Moya v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
| Cynthia Moya |
| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc., 3316 22nd Ave, S.E., Rio Rancho, New Mexico, APN: 1-013-067-081-112, Lot 28 in Block 21 of Rio Rancho Estates, Unit 16 and Deed of Trust No. 78809 |
| 1:2018cv00104 |
| February 1, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| Albuquerque Office |
| Sandoval |
| James O. Browning |
| Jerry H. Ritter |
| All Other Real Property |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
21
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by District Judge James O. Browning. (cab)
|
|
Filing
18
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 16 MOTION to Strike Plaintiff's Response to [Wells Fargo and SPS's] Motion to Dismiss or, In the Alternative, Reply in Support of Well Fargo and SPS's Motion to Dismiss filed by Wells Farg o Bank, N.A., Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc., 4 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. by Magistrate Judge Jerry H. Ritter. Objections to R&R due by 6/1 4/2018. Add 3 days to the deadline if service is by mailing it to the person's last known address (or means described in Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b)(2)(D) and (F)); if service is by electronic means, no additional days are added. (Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(d); Fed. R. Crim. P. 45(c).) (mlt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
