Lujan v. Corizon Health Care et al
| Pete Lujan |
| Corizon Health Care and Centurian Correctional Health Care |
| 1:2018cv00239 |
| March 12, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| Albuquerque Office |
| Union |
| William P. Johnson |
| Jerry H. Ritter |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
28
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Chief District Judge William P. Johnson denying 20 MOTION to Appoint Counsel, 24 MOTION to Appoint Counsel, 19 MOTION to Extend (other). (meq)
|
|
Filing
17
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Chief District Judge William P. Johnson, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion for Default Judgment Doc. 14 is DENIED as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Amended Civil Rights Complaint Doc 13 is DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6); and the Court will enter a separate judgment resolving the civil case (meq)
|
|
Filing
12
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Chief District Judge William P. Johnson, It is ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Relief 11 is DENIED; and his Civil Rights Complaint 1 is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff may file an amended complaint within thirty (30) days of entry of this order. (meq)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
