Vialpando v. Chevron Mining, Inc.
Filbert C Vialpando |
Chevron Mining Inc. |
1:2018cv00251 |
March 15, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
Albuquerque Office |
Colfax |
Karen B. Molzen |
Steven C. Yarbrough |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 37 ORDER Adopting as modified Initial 33 , Supplemental 35 , and Amended Supplemental Magistrate Judge's Proposed Findings & Recommendation as to Attorney's Fees and Costs to be Awarded 36 by Circuit Judge Bobby R Baldock. (jh) |
Filing 36 AMENDED SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS as to the amount of attorneys' fees and costs to be awarded by Magistrate Judge Jerry H. Ritter Objections to R&R due by 7/9/2019. Add 3 days to the deadline if service is by mailing it to the person's last known address (or means described in Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b)(2)(D) and (F)); if service is by electronic means, no additional days are added. (Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(d); Fed. R. Crim. P. 45(c).) (plp) |
Filing 35 SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Magistrate Judge Jerry H. Ritter as to the amount of attorneys' fees and costs to be awarded. Objections to R&R due by 7/8/2019. Add 3 days to the deadline if service is by mailing it to the person's last known address (or means described in Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b)(2)(D) and (F)); if service is by electronic means, no additional days are added. (Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(d); Fed. R. Crim. P. 45(c).) (plp) |
Filing 33 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Magistrate Judge Jerry H. Ritter as to the amount of attorneys' fees and costs to be awarded. Objections to R&R due by 6/17/2019. Add 3 days to the deadline if service is by mailing it to the person's last known address (or means described in Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b)(2)(D) and (F)); if service is by electronic means, no additional days are added. (Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(d); Fed. R. Crim. P. 45(c).) (plp) |
Filing 32 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ATTONEYS' FEES AND COSTS by Circuit Judge Bobby R. Baldock granting 26 Motion for Attorney Fees; granting 26 Motion for Bill of Costs. (jh) |
Filing 25 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S RULE 59 MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND JUDGMENT 21 by Circuit Judge Bobby R. Baldock. (jh) |
Filing 19 ORDER ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT by Circuit Judge Bobby R Baldock granting in part and denying in part 11 VIALPANDO's Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 15 CHEVRON's Motion for Summary Judgment. (jh) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Vialpando v. Chevron Mining, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Chevron Mining Inc. | |
Represented By: | Timothy S. Hale |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Filbert C Vialpando | |
Represented By: | Karen Grohman |
Represented By: | Evan B. Smith |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.