Dunn v. Smith et al
Kenneth A Dunn |
Ken Smith and Attorney General State of New Mexico |
1:2018cv00289 |
March 27, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
Albuquerque Office |
Valencia |
Kenneth J. Gonzales |
Karen B. Molzen |
General |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 52 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by District Judge Margaret I. Strickland ADOPTING 42 Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition and OVERRULING 47 Petitioner's Objections; DENYING 50 Respondents' Motion to Strike; DISMISSING WITH PREJUDICE the 31 Amended Petition; and GRANTING a certificate of appealability. (rcf) |
Filing 42 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Magistrate Judge Karen B. Molzen as to Petitioner's Section 2254 Habeas Petition. Objections to R&R due by 4/5/2022. Add 3 days to the deadline if service is by mailing it to the person's last known address (or means described in Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b)(2)(D) and (F)); if service is by electronic means, no additional days are added. (Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(d); Fed. R. Crim. P. 45(c).) (KBM) |
Filing 12 FINAL JUDGMENT by District Judge Kenneth J. Gonzales. (tah) |
Filing 9 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Karen B. Molzen. Show Cause Response due by 1/14/2019. (KBM) |
Filing 7 ORDER by District Judge Kenneth J. Gonzales denying 4 Motion to Proceed under 28 U.S.C. 1915. (tah) |
Filing 5 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Karen B. Molzen by District Judge Kenneth J. Gonzales. (tah) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.